Type I interferon autoantibodies in hospitalized patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome and association with outcomes and treatment effect of interferon beta …

F Alotaibi, NK Alharbi, LB Rosen… - Influenza and Other …, 2023 - Wiley Online Library
F Alotaibi, NK Alharbi, LB Rosen, AY Asiri, AM Assiri, HH Balkhy, M Al Jeraisy, Y Mandourah…
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, 2023Wiley Online Library
Abstract Background Type I interferons (IFNs) are essential antiviral cytokines induced upon
respiratory exposure to coronaviruses. Defects in type I IFN signaling can result in severe
disease upon exposure to respiratory viral infection and are associated with worse clinical
outcomes. Neutralizing autoantibodies (auto‐Abs) to type I IFNs were reported as a risk
factor for life‐threatening COVID‐19, but their presence has not been evaluated in patients
with severe Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Methods We evaluated the …
Background
Type I interferons (IFNs) are essential antiviral cytokines induced upon respiratory exposure to coronaviruses. Defects in type I IFN signaling can result in severe disease upon exposure to respiratory viral infection and are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Neutralizing autoantibodies (auto‐Abs) to type I IFNs were reported as a risk factor for life‐threatening COVID‐19, but their presence has not been evaluated in patients with severe Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS).
Methods
We evaluated the prevalence of type I IFN auto‐Abs in a cohort of hospitalized patients with MERS who were enrolled in a placebo‐controlled clinical trial for treatment with IFN‐β1b and lopinavir‐ritonavir (MIRACLE trial). Samples were tested for type I IFN auto‐Abs using a multiplex particle‐based assay.
Results
Among the 62 enrolled patients, 15 (24.2%) were positive for immunoglobulin G auto‐Abs for at least one subtype of type I IFNs. Auto‐Abs positive patients were not different from auto‐Abs negative patients in age, sex, or comorbidities. However, the majority (93.3%) of patients who were auto‐Abs positive were critically ill and admitted to the ICU at the time of enrollment compared to 66% in the auto‐Abs negative patients. The effect of treatment with IFN‐β1b and lopinavir‐ritonavir did not significantly differ between the two groups.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the presence of type I IFN auto‐Abs in hospitalized patients with MERS.
Wiley Online Library